@shv_founder ↗
Services / Website upgrades Moscow · Worldwide

Site upgrades by metrics, not estimates

Site is live but slows leads, speed, or growth: bugs, UX, SEO, and integrations. We upgrade pointwise from bottlenecks and impact — smart fixes first, no full rewrite by default.

Why it matters

A full rebuild is expensive and often unnecessary. While you start over, the live site keeps leaking conversion, speed, and trust. Without revenue-first priorities, teams fix what’s visible, not what pays — budget goes to cosmetics, regression risk rises, release slips.

What we do

In this engagement:

  • Current-state audit — code, UX, speed, SEO, analytics, integrations: what actually blocks results
  • Priorities by revenue impact — a roadmap from bottlenecks to metrics, not from wishlists to endless backlog
  • UX and performance fixes — forms, mobile, Core Web Vitals, stability of critical user flows
  • New blocks and flows — sections, in-site landings, accounts, payments, CRM and marketing connections
  • Regression checks and safe release — verify critical paths, ship without downtime or user-facing surprises

How we work

Short audit → 2–4 week roadmap → sprints with a clear increment. Every iteration: what changed, why, and what effect we expect. We don’t touch stack or architecture for fashion — only when it removes a growth constraint.

FAQ

How long do upgrades take, and can you ship without taking the site down?

After the review we lock scope and timeline: work usually runs in 2–4 week iterations, from a focused fix to a bundled upgrade set. We plan a safe release — critical flows checked, no downtime when the setup allows it.

What drives the price, and when do you quote it?

It depends on codebase health, depth of changes, integrations, and regression risk — not a screen count. We give a timeline and budget range after a short audit: bottlenecks and impact first, then the estimate. No hard number without that review.

Next / Your project

Strengthen what works, cut what kills your leads.