@shv_founder ↗
Services / DevSecOps / CI/CD security Moscow · Worldwide

DevSecOps: catch holes in CI/CD before prod

Scanners, secrets, quality gates, artifact signing in the pipeline. Security on every merge — without manual review that can’t keep up.

Why it matters

Without security in the pipeline you pay twice: once for “ship and hope,” then for the incident, rollback, and lost trust. Manual control doesn’t scale—the pipeline should be your always-on security engineer on every PR.

What we do

In this engagement:

  • CI/CD audit — gaps in gates, secrets, permissions, and artifact flow
  • SAST/DAST & deps — scanners and policies on every PR, not “when we have time”
  • Secrets & least privilege — vault/OIDC, rotation, minimal rights for runners and bots
  • Artifact signing & SBOM — build provenance you can prove, supply chain you can trust
  • Merge policies & alerts — block on real risk only; signal goes to the right channel

How we work

We start with your current pipeline and a risk map. Fast PR gates first (secrets, deps, critical SAST), then deeper: DAST on staging, signing, SBOM, merge policies, and alerting. We cut noisy rules and tune thresholds to your release pace. Scope and timeline are fixed after the review—no “boil the ocean” theater.

FAQ

How long does rollout take, and will it freeze releases?

We roll out in iterations: audit and soft gates first, then tighten policies. We don’t freeze releases for a perfect diagram. Timeline and phases are set after we review your CI/CD and stack.

What drives the cost?

Number of pipelines and repos, stack, depth of SAST/DAST/SBOM, secrets and policy work, and whether you need ongoing support. After a short review we give a range and lock scope—no mid-flight surprises.

Next / Your project

Show the CI — we’ll add gates without noise.